Showing posts with label Sockeye Salmon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sockeye Salmon. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 21, 2021

DLG Council Candidate Survey


Last week I reached out to a dozen or so local residents that own property and run businesses in Dillingham.  I asked for their assistance in composing a list of questions for the people campaigning to represent Us on the Dillingham City Council and as Mayor.  The response was overwhelming with many of the people asking a lot of the same questions… here Ya’ go folks. I suggest that if you like the list… copy and paste it into an email to the City of Dillingham (communitysuggestions@dillinghamak.us) as a suggestion for the upcoming ‘debate’ on September 27, 28 and 29, 2021. 



In order to help voters become informed about the issues surrounding governance in Dillingham, We submit the following questions to candidates seeking to be elected to two council seats and the position of Mayor.  As the election is fast approaching it is expected that responses be returned no later than September 25, 2021 so that voters can have ample opportunity to review response and make informed choices when casting their votes.


  1. What do you see as the single biggest issue facing the City of Dillingham in the next 3 years?
  2. What do you plan to do to help curb deficit spending by the City of Dillingham?
  3. Will you support the City of Dillingham providing funding for the Dillingham City School District if the curriculum contains social justice and/or critical race theory based education supplements?
  4. Will you support the increase of any taxes on sales, services and property within the City of Dillingham?
  5. Will you support the maintaining of EO 2020-22… the ‘permanent emergency’ ordinance that ceded the council’s regulatory authority to the City Manager?
  6. What can the City of Dillingham do to help keep more of the commercial fishing fleet based out of Dillingham thus increasing it’s economic impact upon our community?
  7. What can the City of Dillingham do to help increase economic opportunities for residents? 
  8. What can be done to increase job performance of City employees and/or contractors to make sure We the taxpayers are getting our money’s worth?


We look forward to your replies.


Thanks,

Jon Corbett


Thursday, March 4, 2021

#AmericanStatusUpdate #NoPebbleMine

#AmericanStatusUpdate 3-4-21

BTW Folks... I was granted access to my Twitter account again. So if your curious about my more regular rantings and miscellaneous thoughts on all manner of current events you can find my profile and newest #AmericanStatusUpdate with an Exclusive State of The Union video and commentary here: 

https://twitter.com/JonRCorbett/status/1367518379075014656?s=20

So since being booted from almost all forms of social media and being the subject of the unconstitutional semi-public/confidential investigation by the City of Dillingham... I've been pretty busy refocusing on some more pertinent issues. I still stand 100% behind everything I have ever written, said or done regarding all interactions I have ever had with the City. That's about all I can relay on that matter as I am under advice of counsel to lay low until we figure out what they are doing.

I can however speak to an issue that is close to heart and soul... Protecting Bristol Bay.  Several days ago the Biden Administration accepted an appeal to a mine permitting decision.  The mining project in question is the Pebble Mine.  On numerous occasions, We the People of Alaska have clearly stated that we do not want this mine developed on Our land.  Opposition to this perpetual destruction was affirmed when the majority of Alaskan voters ratified the Bristol Bay Forever Initiative.  Even the Trump Administration was vocal in their opposition to this massive mining disaster being pushed by a foreign corporation and corrupted politicians.  

#WeThePeople said #NoPebble...  #Biden heard #NoRebel. #StopBombingSyria!


Which brings me to ask... Why is Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy so blatantly disregarding the voices of Alaskans on the Pebble Mine issue?

Just a reminder to Governor Dunleavy: The Alaska Constitution is extremely clear about  development and commonly owned resources.  No resource shall be developed at the risk of another and that all development is for the best sustained use for the benefit of Alaska. Seriously... go have your LT. Governor and/or AG look it up. Better yet I will provide a couple of the relevant passages here:

Article VIII – Natural Resources

Wherever occurring in their natural state, fish, wildlife, and waters are reserved to the people for common use.

Fish, forests, wildlife, grasslands, and all other replenishable resources belonging to the State shall be utilized, developed, and maintained on the sustained yield principle, subject to preferences among beneficial uses.  

AK Constitution Link

CLICK HERE

SaveBristolBay.org


Thursday, June 29, 2017

Helping Our Neighbors

I penned and sent this letter to several Bristol Bay regional leaders and posted it in several regionally relevant discussion groups concerning the collapse of the Yukon-Kuskokwim Chinook subsistence fishery... No responses as of yet:

Dear Bristol Bay Leaders,

So I was listening to KDLG this morning and the story of the Y-K Chinook subsistence harvest, or lack thereof peaked my interest, it's been too many years without a solution of relief.  As you know the preservation and beneficial utilization of the ‘fish’ resource rank really high on my list of public concerns.  So, since it’s fish season I thought to write a blog post on this.  In offering a perspective or my personal 2 cents about issues and such, I always attempt to offer an idea for solution instead of just complaining.  So, when it comes to the fish… some of this is almost second nature.

           Over coffee my wife and I were throwing out ideas... We concluded that Bristol Bay must somehow help our neighbors.  We have the resources to provide almost immediate relief and a sustainable solution.  
           
Get Processors/BB entities to donate 2017 fresh frozen fish & transportation to Y-K residents?  Send a couple of AK Airlines 737s up there or even a small barge.
           
Lobby to Amend the M-S Act to require Chinook By-Catch to be retained and then given directly to the Y-K residents. (By-Catch is already retained and goes to SeaShare to be distributed through their network… I believe that the Y-K residents should have priority on the North Pacific by-catch.)

These might not be original; I worry about the people being without and would like to talk about it.  When you have a minute, can we talk?  Please feel free to call me @ XXX-XXX.  I look forward to hearing from you.

Thanks,

Jon Corbett


Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Just A Little Pebble Reminder...

As various organizations are gathering to testify and lobby the Alaska State Legislature on the merits or demerits of the exploration and development of the proposed Pebble Project by a foreign corporation in the spawning grounds and headwaters of the Bristol Bay Fishery... Let's remind the representatives of We The People of Alaska what the legacy of PLP's operations was just 5 and a half years ago.


Monday, February 22, 2016

Bristol Bay...Why?

Why Bristol Bay Forever...

I am re-posting this opinion piece that I did on the Bristol Bay Forever initiative that was passed by Alaskan voters in the 2014 General Election by an almost double margin.  However, I was actually shocked several times in the last month when talking to candidates for both State and Federal seats that had no idea that this even happened, much less any of the details.  So here’s a refresher with a few links at the bottom of the page.

Originally Posted: July 26, 2014


For the past decade the majority of the people in the Bristol Bay region have been embroiled in a political battle with foreign corporations and Our Own state. At issue is development of industrial scale mining in the headwaters of the Mulchatna, Nushagak and Kvichak Rivers. This watershed provides about a third of the World's Salmon and many other species of tasty seafood as well. Bristol Bay is one of the last Wild fisheries left globally and The State of Alaska's corporatist government in Juneau has set it's sights on helping foreign corporations destroy the region for foreign benefit.

The Bristol Bay Forever initiative isn't about adding additional restrictions to the current regulations regarding mining. What it is about is fixing the actions of the past 2 1/2 Alaska Governors and the legislatures that faltered in their sworn duties. In the past decade We The People of Alaska have been grossly misrepresented in Juneau while lobbyists, influence peddlers and bucketmilkers have taken control of Our government and resources. A 'Yes' vote will create a legislative process to approve any large-scale resource development in Bristol Bay. As part of this, We The People will gain a seat at the table which was taken from Us by the current Governor when he coerced the legislature to allow the Coastal Zone Management Program to sunset and subsequently supported the opposition to a referendum to reinstate the program.

Much like the Repeal SB21 vote... this all really boils down to is that the big dollar outside and foreign resource extraction industry has hijacked Juneau from We The People of Alaska and America. In regards to the Tribes of Bristol Bay asking that the US EPA initiate the 404c portion of the Clean Water Act, this was done because We The People felt as if no one in Alaska was listening and that the State of Alaska had already sold Us down the river. No one wants more regulations and government controls out here, because that exactly what created this situation to begin with.

The Power of Government belongs to We The People of Alaska and supporting the Bristol Bay Forever initiative aims at restoring just that. When the lobbyists spend tens of millions in Juneau to control Our government, It's time to make sure that the voices of We The People are amplified even more.

So when you head to the polls on November 4th... Remember that the Alaska Constitution addresses this clearly... The resources and the government belong to Us...Vote Yes on Bristol Bay Forever!

More Info Here:
http://www.elections.alaska.gov/petitions/12BBAY/12BBAY-Sponsors-Prop-Bill-Lang.pdf

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10201729497753632&set=a.1191325437733.24394.1666304791&type=3&theater
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10201729497753632&set=a.1191325437733.24394.1666304791&type=3&theater


An initiative passed by voters last fall directing any mining in the Bristol Bay Fisheries Reserve to require legislative approval was upheld in a decision last month by the Alaska Supreme Court. -> http://www.thebristolbaytimes.com/article/1507court_holds_up_bristol_bay_initiative







Wednesday, June 18, 2014

DLG Dillingham Small Boat Harbor Video...

Friday, January 31, 2014

January 2014-2013...View From Dillingham, Alaska

Click Image To See Full Sized

Sunday, January 12, 2014

GMO Fish: From Panama to DC...





Currently there are two version of legislation on Capitol Hill regarding the creation and marketing of Genetically Modified Salmon.  Both of these were Originally Sponsored by Alaskan DC Delegation Members Mark Begich (D) US Senate and Don Young (R) US House of Representatives. I decided to see who out there was trying to influence Our Congress on this issue…

Congressional Lobbying 2013:
On the Pro-Side of the senate bill We find The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission spending $20,000 in the first quarter of 2013 for: Issues related to FY 2013 and FY 2014 fisheries management funding; FY 2013 Appropriations; FY 2014 Appropriations; Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Act Reauthorization; S.246 Prevention of Escapement of Genetically Altered Salmon; Coast Guard Reauthorization Act; Atlantic Coastal Act Reauthorization with a firm called Blank Rome.  There is also Friends of The Earth filing to have spent less than $5000.00 in lobbying various issues that also included this one. 

On the Anti side of the Senate and House bills we find the company trying to develop and market this technology, Aqua Bounty and The American Renderers Association (ARA).  The ARA is an 80-year-old meat production and packing industry association that focuses on producing products with animal by-waste.  One of the products is fish food, which they have already seen great success with in providing to the Chilean fish farming industry.

Let’s look at who Aqua Bounty is:

Significant Shareholders:

                    - Intrexon Corporation
53.75%
                    - Alejandro Weinstein (1)
17.66%
             

Alejandro Weinstein is the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of CFR Pharmaceuticals. ß A Chilean Foreign National



Intrexon Ownership:
Intrexon is a developing and growing bio-genetic engineering company aiming at creating synthetic life. 

Intrexon just went public not long ago and a majority of the purchased stocks are controlled by a fund run by a group known as Third Security.  The public offering was underwritten by J.P. Morgan and raised over a billion dollars.  The stock value from this company has also enjoyed a 25%+ growth since it’s IPO.   Their founder and CEO is Randal J. Kirk.  He just happens to the CEO and Founder of Intrexon. Forbes lists Mr. Kirk at #143 of their Top 400 Wealthiest People in America.  Also on the Board of Intrexon are former CEOs of both Monsanto and Pfizer. 







Aqua Bounty and Washington D.C.


Aqua Bounty has contracted with a leading Food and Drug lobbyist firm called Policy Directions Inc.  The lead lobbyists for Aqua Bounty are Jill Homer Stewart and Stephen L. Kopperud.  Let’s look at Mrs. Stewart’s employment history:  


Prior to professional government emplyment she had also interned for Rep. Gary Condit.  Both Visclosky and Condit are listed in lobbyist filings as having had been contacted by Policy Directions concerning the GMO Salmon legislation representing both the American Renderers Association and Aqua Bounty. 





Naturally the FDA was the federal agency most listed in the rather vague filings… but the congressional staffers and such are listed as well.  Congressional Contacts on behalf of Aqua Bounty in 2013 on : FDA approval of transgenic salmon eggs including S. 246.
 Labeling of foods from biotech animals including HR 584, S. 248 and S. Amendment to S. Con Res. 8.

2013 First Quarter:
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, U.S. SENATE, Agriculture - Dept of (USDA), Food & Drug Administration (FDA), Health & Human Services - Dept of (HHS)

2013 Second Quarter:
 Rep. Peter Visclosky
Rep. Robert Weygand
Sen. Dianne Feinstein
Rep. Gary Condit

2013 Third Quarter:
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, U.S. SENATE, Health & Human Services - Dept of (HHS), Food & Drug Administration (FDA), Agriculture - Dept of (USDA), U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)


Third Security campaign contributions aren’t too shabby either:
Randal Kirk was one a few Americans that donated $50000 to President Obama’s Inauguration Fund in 2009.  That’s ten times the amount allowed as a personal contribution during the election cycle. 


They tend to bounce back and forth from Republican to Democrat, but it is interesting to know that Mr. Krk not only donated to the Inauguration, but he also gave $16000 to Obama’s Victory Fund and another $2300 to Obama for America.








Life Cycle of the GMO Salmon:

The GMO Salmon begins as eggs in a lab located in Massachusetts…then goes to ditch’s in Panama.  These eggs have been genetically modified and combined with an Atlantic fish called the Ocean Pout.





Accumulated and Published by Jon Corbett.