Showing posts with label juneau. Show all posts
Showing posts with label juneau. Show all posts

Thursday, April 6, 2017

Simple Math 101*

Hypothetical Situation:  Let’s say there’s a community with a population of 2500 people that have an employment participation of about 1200.  Then let’s say that the average income is about $50,000.00.   Under the current flavor of the proposed income tax bill, an Alaskan earning $50000 will pay about $620 filing jointly or $800 filing singly. *** Now, multiply the median of those tax liability numbers (710) with the number of taxpayers (1200) and you come up with $852,000.00*. 

That’s how much money would be pulled from the private sector and sent directly to the government.  If one considers that maybe 50% of that amount would be spent in local commerce and taxed at 6%, the revenue loss to a municipality would be about $25,000.00* initially.

Now… Let’s also throw in the removal of say $1,000.00 of Permanent Fund Dividend money.  Although the exact numbers are difficult, with a somewhat transitional population, let’s say that 2/3s of the 2500 receive a PFD, What we get is:

2500 X .66 = 1650 X $1000 = $1,650,000.00 X .5 (local spending) = 825,000 X 6% Sales Tax = $49500 Lost Tax Revenue*

Approximate Annual Tax Revenue Loss under the current legislative plan: $75000**

Local Spending Reduction Estimate Totals:
            Income Tax                            $426000*
            Dividend Reduction              +825000*
                                                Total:  $1,251,000 removed from the local economy.*


* This number does not reflect the commerce multiplier.  That multiplier would indicate that monies revolve through a community and have more than just one impact point upon local taxes and general economic strength.  The multiplier tends to be higher in rural or isolated communities and could even indicate that the actual impact upon an Alaska Bush community would be much more critical.


** The taxing authority will be looking to replace that lost income with a new or modified revenue source.  This will also serve to reduce the monies in the local economy and fall under the impacts aforementioned multiplier, thus negatively impacting the local economy even more. 


***Income Tax numbers were culled from an email that was sent out in a press release from the Alaska House Republicans on March 28, 2017.

Friday, February 26, 2016

Waste Not...Want Not?


Word is that the Alaska House Majority is considering 'taking action' against a fellow legislator for calling out legislators on their positions.  This is just plain petty.  As elected representatives, the folks in the Legislature have voluntarily placed themselves up for scrutiny of their actions as legislators.  We also must remember that Our legislators are also Alaskan citizens and have the right to 'call-out' each other on things.  

This isn't the first time that the House 'leadership' has taken actions against a legislator for standing up for their principals.  The whole idea that legislators are essentially snubbing the voters by censuring and limiting the effectiveness of an elected representative of We The People.  Partisanship and personal 'beefs' should never come into the processes of legislative government, as they detract from the spirit and effectiveness of government of the people, by the people and for the people.  
 
The legislators of Alaska should focus their efforts on developing a budget that does not rely on revenue from the pockets of Alaskans in the form of taxes upon the private sector.  The government has to live within the means that it has, not speculative numbers and reliance upon wealth redistribution.  In other words, We have to push Our representatives to work hard to find efficiencies and cut 'slush' spending.  

We have to do this in Our personal finances and expecting Our government to do the same is only right.  Please take the time to drop Your Alaska Representative and Senator a note thanking them for their service and to work hard for Alaska's Future.

PS... Governor Walker's 'Sovereign Wealth Fund' proposes to cap the PFD at $1000 and tie the disbursements to future resource development revenues.  The rest of the revenue will be used for financing some portion of the burgeoning SoA budget.  

BTW... Did You know that the AK Dept. of Public Safety currently has 80 fully funded Trooper positions that are VACANT that equals about $6.5Million annually and has maintained an average of 77 of these positions over the last 10 years?  This scenario is also present in other agencies and has contributed heavily to the deficit spending that the SoA is currently in.  This is a budgeting practice that must be stopped sooner than later. 

Monday, February 22, 2016

Strikes Against The Salmon Update 2016…

Strikes Against The Salmon Update 2016…



Sorry to seem so Doomsday-ish with this post folks, but my intent is to point out that Western Alaska must diversify it’s economy in order to make an effort to stem the declining population and socio-economic trends that are mostly affecting the Native populations. 


Original “Strikes Against The Salmon” from July 2012:

Lawmakers in Juneau propose Fish Tax Increase to help pay for a bloated state government budget:

Large Bristol Bay harvests create market glut and lower wholesale prices of Sockeye:


Smaller Fish are worth less to buyers:

Unusual Whale die-offs are happening all around the Pacific Ocean’s coastlines:

Large bird die-offs are being reported around the Pacific as well:

Seabird Dies off in Bristol Bay reporting by Gary Neilson via The Bristol Bay Times.


Algal toxins on the rise in Alaska: