Thursday, April 15, 2021
Fbooked Again...
Wednesday, April 14, 2021
Forced Capitulation
aka Silence Is Consent...
Today’s secularism has not in one little way actually ‘Woke’ anyone to the ways and will of God. But rather it has produced an culture chocked full of pusillanimous whiners that truly believe that they are owed something. Most often they also feel as if it is the efforts of someone else’s work that should provide for them and their almost always immoral and selfish desires.
Personal responsibility has become something of a rarity and by the way the secularists scream, cry and throw tantrums in the streets... it’s no wonder that they suffer amongst and within themselves. They sincerely but falsely think that government is responsible for providing for their sins and also to protect them from themselves. Just saying that people are owed something doesn’t mean it is true.
But let’s drill down to the core of the issues. First off, no where in the Bible does it say that any man must by government degree become dependent upon other men. Secondly, no where in the Bible does it say that government decree outweighs God’s word and the bastardized use of Scripture to justify abominable behavior such as elective abortion and homosexuality is quite simply wrong.
Society by abandoning God and refusing to succumb to his Grace and Will has doomed itself to be judged... and rather harshly. God demonstrated this multiple times throughout history and has clearly revealed that he will do so again. If you have stood before man and professed your faith in God through Christ... you know this all to be true and factual. There’s absolutely NO middle ground.
God also commands Mankind to demonstrate His grace and will through Our actions. No where in the Bible does it say that Christians should take a ‘wait ‘n see’ approach to sharing God’s love. Christ told Us all to go forth and become fishers of souls... to go across the world and spread the Gospel to inspire the people to turn towards his Wokeness and to emulate Christ to the best of our own God blessed abilities. No where in the Bible does it say to be quiet and shirk those duties to God.
As Christians We are clearly told to be bold and demonstrate our want for God’s Will... God also tells Us that we are to Love our enemies. In Matthew, Christ explains a few things about our interactions with the world. I suggest reading Matthew Chapters 5-7 to gain more insight on how Christianity mixes with Worldly. Here’s one key verse:
Matthew 5:19
“Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”
Thursday, November 12, 2020
Thursday Thoughts...Redacted
Now that I’m having to use my creative outlet of writing under advice to avoid topics concerning my local and state governments, sometimes finding something else to write about can be quite the challenge. I am naturally drawn to topics that more directly affect me, my family and my friends, thus why I’ve concentrated on local, regional and state topics. Whether you agree with my positions on issues, I still have the right to publish my views on them as long as I am civil and factual. For example… the taxation issue that I’ve brought up many times before.
Yes, the government needs funding and I strongly believe that if they want to take that funding from people that have already paid income taxes, local governments should diligently strive to constrain spending so that it does not exceed their legal income. If the local government is mandated to spend more money than it has, it should first seek full-relief from the entity that is mandating any spending. The next course of action is to draw up a responsible and detailed fiscal plan and present it in-full to the constituents. Then if more funding is needed and the government decides to use taxation to acquire it… they must follow the prescribed method by which to enact a taxation schedule.
The State of Alaska Statutes clearly states that modifications and additional taxes must be approved by a majority of the Voters in a public Referendum and the City of Dillingham Municipal Code references this exact statute. But this is not how things operate here in Dillingham Alaska. Despite the fact that this has been brought to the attention of the Mayor, City Council and Manager’s office many times before, not one thing has been done to remedy this fault.
Why is that?
Saturday, October 31, 2020
K.I.S.S. Rule…
Sometimes things in life just do NOT have to be complicated. Adding too much into a process can often serve counter to the purpose to begin with. For example, when writing a letter to elected representatives of We the People, the author should strive to get the point across in the opening paragraph. Adding too much verbiage and details that can be brought up later will often cause the reader’s eyes to glaze over and their mind to gloss over the entire intent.
This is especially true when dealing with complex topics that have many facets to consider… such as mitigation efforts to stifle the potential spread of a contagion that could possibly pose a potential risk to segments of the population. The issues surrounding the Covid-19/Corona virus are a myriad of emotions and science that can easily be construed to portray whatever a person wants them to say. Currently the Dillingham City Council is striving to maintain operations in a manner to keep people safe… but the language of proposed ordinance 2020-22 is far to ambiguous and essentially places our community in a perpetual ‘State of Emergency’.
After various communications with just two of the elected representatives of the people of Dillingham, I can pretty much say that the City Council is not going to ‘table’ the ordinance during next week’s meeting. They have repeatedly communicated that they are not willing to hold a public in-person forum so that We the People may redress our concerns about the language of 2020-22. This is disappointing to say the least… but is also very indicative of the issues that We face in getting the governance that We deserve from Our government.
K.I.S.S. - K.eep I.t S.imply S.simple
The US Constitution:
“Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
That word ‘Congress’ is interchangeable with any term used to describe any position of governance such as assembly or council. The US Constitution is not a granting of any rights… it is a document that defines what the government cannot do and what rights We the People have secured as Ours. When a government entity takes it upon itself to grow bureaucracy and ignore the people, then it has out served its purpose and must be replaced in order to stop the potential for tyranny.
REMEMBER, REMEMBER THE 5TH OF NOVEMBER…
Friday, July 14, 2017
Oh My Whaaa...
Wednesday, August 10, 2016
Say What...Do What?!
Yesterday, Republican Presidential Candidadate Donald Trump spoke at Trask Coliseum in my hometown of Wilmington, NC. From the pictures and videos posted across the Internet, it appears that he packed the 5200 seat venue with plenty more people waiting outside. The general air of the attendees was enthusiastic and definately fed into his egomania. But that's all irrelevant because of his comments...
While addressing the potential of having federal courts seated with Clinton appointtees, he said something along the lines of; "the way, and if she gets to pick – if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks," Trump warned. "Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don't know." Instantly the media picked up on this and began interpreting it as a 'call to arms' for someone to assasinate his Democratic opponent and/or any judges she may appoint if elected. I'm not so sure that was what the comment from the often flame mouthed candidate meant...
I went back and watched the video several times and have concluded that he meant that it's up to proponents of the Second Amendment to use their political power during the upcoming election to ensure that strong supporters of 'Gun Rights' are elected into Congress to block any judicial nominations made by Clinton. If that's not what he meant... then maybe he should publically clarify his words. This of course is not the first, second, third and most definately will not be the last time Mr. Trump has spouted off something that could be easily misconstrued.
Wednesday, February 17, 2016
Tuesday, February 9, 2016
Dear Government...
— #INTELINFIDEL! (@JonRCorbett) February 9, 2016


